
“Hi” is a greeting, not a conversation plan. I am willing to admire its brevity; I cannot pretend it has given me much to work with. A good first message doesn’t need to be dazzling or accompanied by the complete collected history of its sender. A specific observation, a sensible question or a few words explaining what caught your attention will do far more. I enjoy personality. I particularly enjoy the reassuring impression that the person has noticed who he is speaking to, rather than opening a conversation with the general category of women available on the internet.
“Hi, how are you?” is a perfectly ordinary greeting. It also leaves quite a bit of work for the recipient, particularly when there’s no other context. There’s no need to turn that into a judgement about someone’s character; people can be shy, distracted or unsure how to begin. But if you want a conversation to go somewhere, a little context helps. What brought you to the page? Was there a particular piece you enjoyed? Is there something you actually want to ask? The answer can be brief. It simply gives the next person something more useful than a blank space.
For example, “I enjoyed your post about writing, especially the part about knowing when to stop revising. Do you find beginnings or endings harder?” offers a subject and a manageable question. “I’ve been reading your recent entries and would like to know where to find the longer pieces” is equally straightforward. Neither is a message anyone needs to copy word for word. They’re examples of the difference between announcing your presence and contributing something to a conversation. A message can be thoughtful without sounding as though it has been polished for a literary prize.
Thoughtfulness and the price of a messaging channel are separate questions. If a platform charges to send a message, those current terms still apply; a well-written introduction isn’t a substitute for the stated fee. An additional gift, however, doesn’t automatically improve the writing or purchase a personal reply that hasn’t been offered. What makes an introduction useful is its relevance, clarity and consideration. I would rather keep those things distinct than suggest that good manners can be bought as an extra. Check the channel’s terms, then give the message itself a little care.
Length needs a little judgement. An introduction is not necessarily improved by including every preference, previous experience and possible future intention before the recipient has replied to the first sentence. One or two clear points leave space for an exchange. A practical enquiry needs the relevant details; a comment about writing can remain a comment about writing. There is no need to submit the appendices. I like a person who knows when a sentence has done its job. It suggests he may also recognise when another person would quite like a turn.
Nor is silence a failing. A great many readers never write at all, and I don’t regard their quiet as a deficiency to be corrected. Some people prefer to read and leave it at that, and their preference is entirely legitimate. An introduction is an offer, not an obligation, and those who choose not to make one have simply chosen differently. What I’m describing here is not a requirement but a standard – the standard to which a message is held if it’s sent, and the reason some messages are answered easily while others are not.
A reply still isn’t guaranteed simply because a message was well written. Availability, interest and the nature of the channel all matter. That’s why I think of an introduction as an offer of conversation rather than an application with a result due by return. Give it a little time. Avoid sending several follow-ups to ask whether the first one was sufficiently interesting. If there’s a practical problem with something purchased, use the proper support or booking route instead of burying it in a social introduction. The two kinds of message deserve to be understood for what they are.
Bring an observation, ask something worth answering, and leave room for the reply. The perfect opening line is optional. Evidence that you’ve actually read something is rather more useful.
Not ready yet? Follow The Smyth Fund for free on LoyalFans.
Additional Reading:
The Human Wallet: What Your Money Buys a Luxury Domme (And What It Doesn't)
